Cervical Cancer Prevention Scientific Evidence †MyAssignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about the Cervical Cancer Prevention Scientific Evidence. Answer: Introduction: Development of vaccine against human papilloma virus (HPV) over the past created a heated debate. The debate has been on whether to mandate the HPV vaccine which can help control the cervical disease causing virus human papilloma virus. The debate has been between two opposing sides who want the vaccine tested and the opposing group who are not for the trial claiming it as unethical medical practice (Intemann de Melo, 2010). The debate between these two sides could also be viewed as competing ethical values. The issue of autonomy in relation to HPV vaccination is the main cause the debate where it was proposed that young girls and women should go through a mandatory HPV vaccination. The heated debate against and for the HPV vaccine resulted into creation of a special committee by the government which came up with an ethical framework for screening and oversight on the ethical conduct in relation to human papilloma virus vaccine. The conflict resulting to the change can be conceptualized graphically on theories such as utilitarianism, and justice which supports the vaccination based on its benefits. The theory of utilitarianism when applied to human papilloma virus vaccine with various condition met as outlined by the oversight committee, humanity towards the virus control becomes a realistic objective. The policies relating to changes in the healthcare system in relation to female patients making decisions. The committee appointed by the government came up with policies allowing women to consent before being vaccinated against human papilloma. Prior to women patients right implementation (Parker, 2010). Doctors assumed that they right and treated women without their consent. The women rights to make decisions can be evaluated through various ethical theories such as utilitarianism, double effect and principlism. Various scholars such as Zukerman in their schools of thought stated that HPV vaccine can be used universally for young girls of between ages 11year to 12 years with autonomy given to the parent. Utilitarianism theory also states that with all the procedures observed the vaccination can be mandated even though it takes autonomy from patients. Compared to early days, it can be said that new policies related to women patients autonomy provides justice. However, implementation of compulsory HPV vaccination among young girls of age 11-12 years since the government takes parent and children autonomy. The parents autonomy and consent is important when it comes to medical service provision. However, the current policies in relation patients right and autonomy provides justice. The implementation of compulsory vaccine is not helpful to all members of the society. There are groups in the society who prefer abstinence as a way of control HPV virus thus feels uncomfortable with HPV vaccine. On the other hand, policies preventing compulsory vaccination results into people who are less fortune not to get HPV screening and treatment as a result of the high cost. The mandatory human papilloma virus is against the moral codes of the society as most individuals in the society specifically the religious community. The claim that HPV vaccine encourages sexual immorality. References Intemann, K., de Melo-Martn, I. (2010). Social values and scientific evidence: the case of the HPV vaccines.Biology philosophy,25(2), 203-213. Parker, C. (2010). One for the girls?: Cervical cancer prevention and the introduction of the HPV vaccine in Aotearoa New Zealand.Women's Studies Journal,24(2), 25.